The other half

Fear and greed: the half a ranking cannot see.

SageRanks answers one question well: what does this company look like next to its peers, measured the way a particular investor measured. It says almost nothing about what the market is feeling today. That is deliberate, and it is worth explaining what we leave out.

Fear & Greed app screens showing a fear and greed gauge, its history and the components behind it.
Fear & Greed · the sentiment half of the same picture
Fear & Greed · Stocks & Crypto
Free, Android, from the same studio that builds SageRanks.
5,000+ downloads on Google Play
Get it on Google Play

What this site actually measures

Every ranking here is built from ten numbers per company: price to book, PEG, P/E, return on equity, gross margin, revenue growth, beta, RSI, analyst upside and the spread of analyst ratings. Five investor lenses weight those ten differently, and the same company can be first under one lens and unremarkable under another.

Nine of those ten describe the business. Only one, RSI, describes the mood around it, and it carries the lightest weight on the site: ×1, in Fisher's lens alone. Four of the five lenses ignore sentiment entirely. That is not an oversight we plan to fix. Graham, Buffett, Lynch and Greenblatt all built their methods specifically to avoid being moved by what everyone else was feeling.

A ranking tells you what something is worth. It cannot tell you what people are willing to pay for it this week.

Graham already named the problem

The idea that the market has moods is not a modern invention, and it is not opposed to value investing. It is Graham's own. His Mr. Market is an imaginary business partner who turns up every day with a price, cheerful one morning and despairing the next, and whose only real use is that you may deal with him when his mood suits you and ignore him otherwise.

So the two halves were always meant to work together. The fundamentals tell you which businesses are worth owning. The mood tells you when the crowd is likely to hand one to you cheaply, or to pay you far too much for it. Mr. Market is in our glossary, and Graham's essay spends most of its length on exactly this discipline.

What a fear and greed index measures

Where a ranking looks at companies, a sentiment index looks at the market as a whole, and it does it by watching how people behave rather than what they say. The widely used version reads seven signals and combines them into one number between 0 and 100, where low is fear and high is greed:

None of those seven is in our data, and none of them ever will be: they describe a market, not a company, and this site ranks companies within an index. That is the honest boundary of the tool.

Two questions, two tools

That is why we built the second tool as a separate thing rather than bolting a mood gauge onto a ranking table. Fear & Greed reads the market; SageRanks reads the companies in it. Neither pretends to do the other one's job.

Used together the pair answers a question neither half can answer alone. SageRanks says this company screens well through Graham's rules right now. A sentiment reading says the market is fearful right now. Graham's whole argument is that the second is when the first is worth acting on. If you want the second half, the app is on Google Play, where it has passed five thousand downloads.

Disclosure. Fear & Greed is our own app, it is free, and it is paid for by ads. We are pointing at it because the two tools genuinely cover different halves of the same picture, not because anyone paid for the placement. As always, nothing on this site is investment advice.